Summary
noting that "an officer's telling a defendant that he could not `buy' one of the defendant's statements and that the defendant should tell the truth did not amount to coercion"
Summary of this case from State v. WhitesidesOpinion
2001
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2001
553 S.E.2d 397 (N.C. 2001)
Summaries of
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2001
553 S.E.2d 397 (N.C. 2001)
noting that "an officer's telling a defendant that he could not `buy' one of the defendant's statements and that the defendant should tell the truth did not amount to coercion"
Summary of this case from State v. WhitesidesCase details for
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 2001
Citations
553 S.E.2d 397 (N.C. 2001)
354 N.C. 227
Citing Cases
State v. Whitesides
Further, Detective Murphy's statement to Defendant that he did not believe Defendant, and the detective's…
State v. WebsterThe acts creating this apprehension of danger "must precede or be concomitant with the taking in order for…