Summary
holding a prosecutor may properly question prospectivejurors about whether they would need more than circumstantial evidence to convict
Summary of this case from State v. ButlerOpinion
2000
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2000
351 N.C. 368 (N.C. 2000)
Summaries of
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2000
351 N.C. 368 (N.C. 2000)
holding a prosecutor may properly question prospectivejurors about whether they would need more than circumstantial evidence to convict
Summary of this case from State v. ButlerCase details for
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 2000
Citations
351 N.C. 368 (N.C. 2000)
Citing Cases
Taylor v. Abernethy
This opinion may be rendered even though it amounts to an expert opinion on the ultimate issue to be…
State v. WilsonDefendant cites no authority in support of his final argument; accordingly, that argument (and defendant's…