From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 2001
353 N.C. 375 (N.C. 2001)

Summary

allowing the propounders to move for directed verdict at the close of all evidence on the issues of undue influence and testamentary capacity

Summary of this case from In re Will of Smith

Opinion


547 S.E.2d 411 (N.C. 2001) 353 N.C. 375 INTERIOR DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. James J. AUTRY d/b/a Autry Construction and also d/b/a Autry Drywall & Construction; Marie Autry; Sigma Construction Company, Inc.; and the American Insurance Company, as surety. Specialties, Inc. v. James J. Autry d/b/a Autry Drywall & Construction; Sigma Construction Company, Inc.; and The American Insurance Company, as surety. Bet Plant Services, Inc., d/b/a BPS Equipment Rental & Sales v. James J. Autry d/b/a Autry Drywall & Construction and also d/b/a Autry Construction, Inc.; Sigma Construction Company, Inc.; David A. Martin; County of Cumberland, North Carolina; and The American Insurance Company, as surety. Colonial Material of Fayetteville, Inc. v. James J. Autry d/b/a Autry Drywall & Construction, Inc.; Sigma Construction Company, Inc.; and The American Insurance Company, as surety. No. 559P00. Supreme Court of North Carolina March 1, 2001

         Perry R. Safran, Raleigh, For Sigma Constr., Martin, American.

         Paul A. Sheridan, For BET, Colonial Mat., Int., Spec.

         Prior report: 140 N.C.App. 541, 536 S.E.2d 853.

          ORDER

         Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants (Sigma Construction Company, Inc., David A. Martin and The American Insurance Company) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of March 2001."


Summaries of

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 2001
353 N.C. 375 (N.C. 2001)

allowing the propounders to move for directed verdict at the close of all evidence on the issues of undue influence and testamentary capacity

Summary of this case from In re Will of Smith
Case details for

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 2001

Citations

353 N.C. 375 (N.C. 2001)
353 N.C. 375
547 S.E.2d 10

Citing Cases

Seagraves v. Seagraves

Caveators presented no evidence that Donald and Cindy subjected Pauline to their constant supervision prior…

McCants v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

oversees some aspects of intercollegiate athletics it is not a fiduciary for the thousands of student…