Summary
dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction when non-lawyer corporate officer signed notice of appeal on behalf of corporation
Summary of this case from Triple R v. Ft. WorthOpinion
No. 01-04-00145-CV
Opinion issued August 4, 2005.
On Appeal from the 80th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 2002-56539.
Panel consists of Justices NUCHIA, KEYES, and BLAND.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellees Harris County, Harris County Education Department, City of Houston, Port of Houston of Harris County Authority, Harris County Flood Control District, Harris County Hospital District, North Harris Montgomery Community College District, and Harris County Rural Fire Prevention District # 24 have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.
The final judgment in this case was signed by the trial court on July 23, 2003. Appellant, Dish TV, Inc., filed a notice of appeal on February 13, 2004, six months and 21 days after the trial court signed the judgment. That notice of appeal was signed by James M. Jugon, president of Dish TV, Inc.
To appeal a trial court's judgment, a party must file a notice of appeal within 30 days after the judgment was signed, unless the time is extended to 90 days by the filing of certain post-judgment motions. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. A party who did not participate in the hearing that resulted in the judgment and did not file a timely post-judgment motion or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law may file a notice of appeal within six months after the judgment was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(c).
The timely filing of a notice of appeal is required to invoke the jurisdiction of the court of appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1. Appellant's notice of appeal was untimely and did not perfect either a regular appeal or a restricted appeal.
In addition, appellant's notice of appeal was signed by the president of the company, who is not licensed to practice law in Texas. A corporation may not appear in court through its officers who are not attorneys, and a notice of appeal filed by such an officer is not effective. Globe Leasing, Inc. v. Engine Supply and Mach. Servs., 437 S.W.2d 43, 45 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1969, no writ); see also Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp, 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996) ("Generally a corporation may be represented only by a licensed attorney. . . ."); Dell Dev. Corp. v. Best Indus. Uniform Supply Co., 743 S.W.2d 302, 303 (Tex.App.-Houston (14th Dist.] 1987, writ denied) ("Corporations may appear and be represented only by a licensed attorney."). Therefore, even if timely, appellant's notice of appeal would not have conferred jurisdiction on this Court.
We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.