From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dipasquale v. Security Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 2004
13 A.D.3d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4827N.

December 7, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered October 6, 2003, which denied plaintiff's motion to vacate his default on an earlier dismissal motion for failure to state a cause of action, and to grant leave to amend his complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.


In order to vacate a default, a plaintiff must offer a reasonable excuse for the default and demonstrate merit to the complaint. Amendment of a complaint may be denied, in the exercise of discretion, where the proposed amended cause is also without merit ( Ava Co. v. Olympic Tower Assoc., 259 AD2d 315, 316). The original complaint was clearly without merit, and the proposed amended complaint sought to reinstate a claim that the court had already dismissed on the merits.


Summaries of

Dipasquale v. Security Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 2004
13 A.D.3d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Dipasquale v. Security Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER E. DIPASQUALE, Appellant, v. SECURITY MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 7, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
785 N.Y.S.2d 335

Citing Cases

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Retail Brand Alliance

Although leave to amend should be liberally granted (CPLR 3025(b)), the merits of the proposed pleadings must…

ROSENAU BECK v. ARAZI

Although leave to amend should be liberally granted (CPLR 3025(b)), the merits of the proposed pleadings must…