From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dinkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 25, 1992
600 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-3910.

June 25, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, R. Hudson Olliff, J.

Kenneth Dinkins, pro se.

Marilyn McFadden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The circuit court denied the petition and appellant took this appeal. The proper method by which to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is by petition for writ of habeas corpus directed to the appellate court which considered the direct appeal. Smith v. State, 400 So.2d 956 (Fla. 1981). Because appellant filed his petition in circuit court, the order denying his petition was proper. We therefore affirm the order on appeal without prejudice to appellant's right to seek relief in the proper forum.

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, C.J., and BOOTH and MINER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dinkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 25, 1992
600 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Dinkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH DINKINS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 25, 1992

Citations

600 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Nairn v. State

Affirmed. See Russell v. State, 740 So.2d 567, 567 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that the Florida Rules of…

Clark v. Crosby

The habeas court did not conduct an evidentiary hearing, did not issue findings of fact or conclusions of…