From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dingwall v. DC Water and Sewer Auth

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
May 25, 2001
773 A.2d 423 (D.C. 2001)

Opinion

Nos. 99-CV-79 and 99-CV-80,

Filed May 25, 2001

BEFORE: Wagner, Chief Judge; Terry, Steadman, Schwelb, Farrell, Ruiz, Reid, Glickman, and Washington, Associate Judges.


ORDER


On consideration of appellee's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's petition for rehearing en banc is granted solely as to the question whether appellant was required to provide appellee with notice pursuant to D.C. Code § 12-309 or the WASA statute, D.C. Code § 43-1672(b). Accordingly the opinion and judgment of February 15, 2001, cited at 766 A.2d 974, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, advise this court as to whether she will be represented by counsel or whether she will proceed pro se. An order establishing a schedule for the submission of new briefs will be issued after receipt of appellant's response to this order.


Summaries of

Dingwall v. DC Water and Sewer Auth

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
May 25, 2001
773 A.2d 423 (D.C. 2001)
Case details for

Dingwall v. DC Water and Sewer Auth

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN DINGWALL, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER AND SEWER…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: May 25, 2001

Citations

773 A.2d 423 (D.C. 2001)

Citing Cases

Jaiyeola v. Dist. of Columbia

The notice-of-claim requirements of § 12–309 therefore apply in this action. See Simmons v. D.C. Armory Bd.,…

Dingwall v. D.C. Water and Sewer Auth

Id. at 979-80. On June 7, 2001, we granted WASA's petition for rehearing en banc with respect to the…