From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dimase v. Aquamar 176

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 29, 2003
835 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 3D01-915.

Opinion filed January 29, 2003.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas S. Wilson, Jr., Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 98-23169.

Armstrong Mejer, P.A., and Alvaro L. Mejer, and Timothy J. Armstrong, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Robert P. Frankel Associates, P.A., and Robert P. Frankel, Miami, for appellees.

Before JORGENSON, COPE, LEVY, GERSTEN, GODERICH, GREEN, FLETCHER, SHEVIN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC


The appellants' motion for rehearing en banc is granted and Judge Ramirez's dissenting opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court. The judgment under review is therefore reversed.

COPE, LEVY, GERSTEN, GODERICH, FLETCHER, SHEVIN, and RAMIREZ, JJ., concur.

SCHWARTZ, C.J., is recused.


I would deny the motion for rehearing en banc for the reasons expressed in the initial majority opinion of this case.

JORGENSON, J., concurs.


Summaries of

Dimase v. Aquamar 176

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 29, 2003
835 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Dimase v. Aquamar 176

Case Details

Full title:JULIAN DiMASE AND GAETANO DiMASE, Appellants, v. AQUAMAR 176, INC.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 29, 2003

Citations

835 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Sorocka v. Severe

'" (citation omitted)). We stated in DiMase v. Aquamar 176, Inc., 835 So.2d 1150, 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA), reh.…

Larrea v. Fisher Island Holdings

FIH was not authorized to accept part (the purchase agreements) and reject part (the letter). See DiMase v.…