From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dillon v. Cockcroft

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1882
90 N.Y. 649 (N.Y. 1882)

Summary

In Dillon v. Cockcroft (90 N.Y. 649) the head note is as follows: "Where, upon a trial the parties do not ask to go to the jury on the facts, but the defendant moves to dismiss the complaint, and the plaintiff moves the court to direct a verdict, this is in effect an agreement to submit the questions of fact to the court, and if there is any evidence to uphold the decision, it will be sustained."

Summary of this case from Lyman v. Mead

Opinion

Argued October 11, 1882

Decided October 24, 1882

E.P. Johnson for appellant.

James Armstrong for respondent.



MILLER, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur, except ANDREWS, Ch. J., dissenting, and RAPALLO and TRACY, JJ., absent.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Dillon v. Cockcroft

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1882
90 N.Y. 649 (N.Y. 1882)

In Dillon v. Cockcroft (90 N.Y. 649) the head note is as follows: "Where, upon a trial the parties do not ask to go to the jury on the facts, but the defendant moves to dismiss the complaint, and the plaintiff moves the court to direct a verdict, this is in effect an agreement to submit the questions of fact to the court, and if there is any evidence to uphold the decision, it will be sustained."

Summary of this case from Lyman v. Mead
Case details for

Dillon v. Cockcroft

Case Details

Full title:JOHN F. DILLON, Respondent, v . JAMES COCKCROFT, Impleaded, etc., Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1882

Citations

90 N.Y. 649 (N.Y. 1882)

Citing Cases

White v. Kenny

On the trial neither party asked to submit any specific question of fact to the jury, thus treating the issue…

Trimble v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

It was held that where a party, upon the trial, rests his case upon certain positions which he calls upon the…