Summary
In Dillingham v. Barron, 6 Misc. 600, 26 N.Y.S. 1109, it appeared that an attorney had been authorized and instructed to enter a special appearance on behalf of a nonresident defendant, but, due to a misapprehension as to the scope of his authority and being under the mistaken impression that the defendant had been personally served with process, he entered his general appearance in the action.
Summary of this case from Johnson v. Zoning Board of AppealsOpinion
December, 1893.
F.J. Worcester, for plaintiff (appellant).
Hatch Wickes, for defendant (respondent).
The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the opinion of the learned judge below.
Present: FREEDMAN and McADAM, JJ.
Order affirmed.