From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dill v. Dill

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
183 A. 172 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Decided January 31st, 1936.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Messrs. Child, Riker, Marsh Shipman, for the appellant.

Messrs. Budd Larner, for the respondents.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 118 N.J. Eq. 374. For affirmance — LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, JJ. 7.

For reversal — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, CASE, HEHER, HETFIELD, RAFFERTY, JJ. 5.


Summaries of

Dill v. Dill

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
183 A. 172 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

Dill v. Dill

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN A. DILL, administrator, c., appellant, v. DANIEL MOUNTFORD DILL et…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 1936

Citations

183 A. 172 (N.J. 1936)
183 A. 172

Citing Cases

Zvolis v. Condos

In such case, independent advice is not a prerequisite to the validity of an improvident gift even though the…

Seylaz v. Bennett

In such case, independent advice is not a prerequisite to the validity of an improvident gift even though the…