From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dignity Health v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 15, 2020
473 P.3d 462 (Nev. 2020)

Opinion

No. 81283

10-15-2020

DIGNITY HEALTH, d/b/a St. Rose Dominican Health-San Martin Campus; and St. Rose Dominican Medical Plaza Limited Partnership, Petitioners, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF CLARK; and the Honorable Mark R. Denton, District Judge, Respondents, and Geoff Walker, Real Party in Interest.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Bighorn Law/Las Vegas


Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas

Bighorn Law/Las Vegas

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss a tort action. Having considered the petition, answer, and supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court , 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court , 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (explaining that this court generally will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions to dismiss). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.


Summaries of

Dignity Health v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 15, 2020
473 P.3d 462 (Nev. 2020)
Case details for

Dignity Health v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:DIGNITY HEALTH, D/B/A ST. ROSE DOMINICAN HEALTH-SAN MARTIN CAMPUS; AND ST…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 15, 2020

Citations

473 P.3d 462 (Nev. 2020)