Digital Ally, Inc. v. Taser Int'l, Inc.

Full title: DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 2, 2018

2017-2296 (Fed. Cir. May. 2, 2018)

Opinion

2017-2296

05-02-2018

DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee

JAMES F.B. DANIELS, McDowell, Rice, Smith & Buchanan, PC, Kansas City, MO, argued for plaintiff-appellant. PAMELA BETH PETERSEN, Axon Enterprise, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN D. GARRETSON, LYNN C. HERNDON, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, MO.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in No. 2:16-cv-02032-CM-TJJ, Judge Carlos Murguia.

JUDGMENT

JAMES F.B. DANIELS, McDowell, Rice, Smith & Buchanan, PC, Kansas City, MO, argued for plaintiff-appellant. PAMELA BETH PETERSEN, Axon Enterprise, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN D. GARRETSON, LYNN C. HERNDON, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, MO. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, MAYER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 2, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court