holding the Rule 11 noncompliance claims are resolved solely on basis of transcript of plea proceedings and not the record of the entire criminal proceedings
Summary of this case from State v. GarciaNo. 85-1934.
October 6, 1986.
C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 790 F. 2d 93.
holding the Rule 11 noncompliance claims are resolved solely on basis of transcript of plea proceedings and not the record of the entire criminal proceedings
Summary of this case from State v. Garciareferring to §§ 52-584 and 52-577 as "statute of limitations"
Summary of this case from Barrett v. Montesanodirecting a verdict for the defendants in the absence of evidence showing that the defendants had actual knowledge of defects in their construction of the plaintiffs' homes
Summary of this case from Dinerstein v. Tranport Moving StorageFull title:DIGICOURSE, INC. v. AMA DISTRIBUTORS, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 6, 1986
We are limited in our review to the record of the plea proceeding. United States v. Kamer, 781 F.2d 1380,…
Daniels v. KanePlea agreements are subject to contract law standards of interpretation. See United States v. Kamer, 781 F.2d…