From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diggs v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Aug 19, 1924
101 So. 357 (Ala. Crim. App. 1924)

Opinion

4 Div. 912.

August 19, 1924.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Barbour County.

John Diggs was convicted of burglary, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

McDowell McDowell, of Eufaula, for appellant.

There was no evidence showing that things of value, etc., were kept for use, sale, or deposit in the storehouse, and defendant was due the affirmative charge as requested.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and O.B. Cornelius, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

If the thing kept in the house was of real pecuniary value, proof of this value supports the averment. Webb v. State, 52 Ala. 422.


The indictment was in Code form and charged a burglary of a dwelling, or shop, store, warehouse, or other building of E.H. Baker, in which goods, merchandise, or clothing, things of value, were kept for sale, use, or deposit. The evidence for the state was that defendant broke and entered a storehouse of E.H. Baker, but there was no evidence that "things of value, were kept for sale, use, or deposit." The judgment in this case is reversed, on authority of Gilmore v. State, 99 Ala. 154, 13 So. 536; Porter v. State, 17 Ala. App. 550, 86 So. 143; Ashmon v. State, 9 Ala. App. 29, 63 So. 754.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Diggs v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Aug 19, 1924
101 So. 357 (Ala. Crim. App. 1924)
Case details for

Diggs v. State

Case Details

Full title:DIGGS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Aug 19, 1924

Citations

101 So. 357 (Ala. Crim. App. 1924)
20 Ala. App. 213

Citing Cases

Harmon v. State

In the absence of proof of the allegation that things of value were kept for use, sale, or deposit, defendant…

Spears v. State

' We are without authority to supply this patent omission in the evidence by assuming that 'canned goods in…