From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dietzmann v. Baca

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 4, 2009
CV 07-07374-GHK (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2009)

Opinion


BART WILLIAM DIETZMANN, Plaintiff, v. LEROY BACA, et al., Defendants. No. CV 07-07374-GHK (MAN) United States District Court, C.D. California. September 4, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

          GEORGE H. KING, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Plaintiff.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Dietzmann v. Baca

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 4, 2009
CV 07-07374-GHK (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Dietzmann v. Baca

Case Details

Full title:BART WILLIAM DIETZMANN, Plaintiff, v. LEROY BACA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 4, 2009

Citations

CV 07-07374-GHK (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Moran v. City of Los Angeles

"The good cause' exception to Rule 4(m) applies only in limited circumstances' and is not satisfied by…

Iqbal v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

And a plaintiff's pro se status does not in itself constitute good cause to excuse defective service. See…