From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dick v. LaVilla Inns, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas
May 12, 1973
510 P.2d 188 (Kan. 1973)

Summary

In Dick v. LaVilla Inns, Inc., 212 Kan. 101, 102, 510 P.2d 188 (1973), this court stated that K.S.A. 60-1103(d) [then K.S.A. 1972 Supp. 60-1103(b)] "sets forth the provisions for crediting payments to subcontractors against claims of the contractor."

Summary of this case from Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand

Opinion

No. 46,747

Opinion filed May 12, 1973.

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

MECHANICS' LIEN — Payment to Subcontractor by Contractor's Surety — Deducting Payment Erroneous. In an action determining amount of contractor's judgment lien, the record is examined and it is found the trial court erred in deducting from the contractor's judgment lien the amount paid to subcontractor by contractor's surety.

Appeal from Labette district court, division No. 4; GEORGE W. DONALDSON, judge. Opinion filed May 12, 1973. Reversed and remanded with directions.

Kenneth H. Foust, of Foust Foust, of Iola, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant.

No appearance by appellees.


The opinion of the court was delivered by


This is an appeal from judgment on a contractor's lien. Appellant claims the trial court erroneously subtracted $21,500 from its judgment.

Appellant is the John V. Dick Construction Company, a partnership owned by John V. Dick and Gary A. Dick, hereafter referred to as Dick. As one of several lienholders, Dick brought suit to foreclose its $97,215.23 mechanic's lien and enforce its interest in property belonging to Robert L. Arnold and Wanda J. Arnold, and LaVilla Inns, Incorporated. Roe Parsons, Jr., a subcontractor hired by Dick, claimed a lien in the sum of $33,091.88. During the pendency of this action, Parsons was paid $21,500 by Western Casualty and Surety Company who furnished Dick's labor and material payment bond. The court took notice of the partial payment of Parsons' claim and accordingly reduced Parsons' judgment by $21,500. In addition, the court reduced Dick's judgment by $21,500.

Dick moved to make Western Casualty and Surety Company an additional party defendant. The court denied that motion, saying Dick previously had opportunity to interplead Western Casualty and had not done so. The court rationalized deducting the $21,500 from both judgments saying Parsons could not be allowed more than his unpaid balance and plaintiff could not be allowed more on that part of its claim attributed to its subcontractor than that subcontractor was entitled to receive.

Dick appeals from the reduced judgment and from the denial of its motion to make Western Casualty a party. None of the other parties brief the questions or appear before the court.

After careful examination of the record we conclude the trial court's action in reducing both Parsons' judgment and Dick's judgment by the amount paid by Dick's surety to Parsons results in a windfall of $21,500 for LaVilla Inns, Inc.

K.S.A. 1972 Supp. 60-1103 ( b) sets forth the provisions for crediting payments to subcontractors against claims of the contractor.

"( b) Rights and liability of owner. The owner of the real property shall not become liable for a greater amount than he has contracted to pay the original contractor, except for any payments to the contractor made prior to the expiration of the three-month period for filing lien claims. The owner may discharge any lien which the contractor fails to discharge under this section and credit such payment against the amount due the contractor."

Only payments by the owner to the subcontractor can be credited against contractor's claim. It was error to deduct from contractor's claim the amount paid the subcontractor by contractor's surety.

The obligation of Dick to Western Casualty, if any, may be the subject of a separate action.

That portion of the judgment is reversed and remanded with directions to the trial court to enter judgment against defendant LaVilla Inns, Inc., in favor of John V. Dick and Gary A. Dick, a partnership d/b/a John V. Dick Construction Company, for the additional sum of $21,500.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

PRAGER, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Dick v. LaVilla Inns, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas
May 12, 1973
510 P.2d 188 (Kan. 1973)

In Dick v. LaVilla Inns, Inc., 212 Kan. 101, 102, 510 P.2d 188 (1973), this court stated that K.S.A. 60-1103(d) [then K.S.A. 1972 Supp. 60-1103(b)] "sets forth the provisions for crediting payments to subcontractors against claims of the contractor."

Summary of this case from Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand
Case details for

Dick v. LaVilla Inns, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN V. DICK and GARY A. DICK, a partnership, doing business under the…

Court:Supreme Court of Kansas

Date published: May 12, 1973

Citations

510 P.2d 188 (Kan. 1973)
510 P.2d 188

Citing Cases

Eisenhut v. Steadman

The statute imposes no condition to the lien, as is argued by Steadman, nor does the statutory language…

Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand

Schwaller Lumber Co., Inc. v. Watson, 211 Kan. 141, 145, 505 P.2d 640 (1973); see Chartrand I, 270 Kan. at…