holding statutory claims to an apparatus for analyzing seismic signals including mathematically described means for "sonogramming", "dividing", and "plotting"
Summary of this case from Arrhythmia Research Technology v. CorazonixNo. 80-13.
March 23, 1981, OCTOBER TERM, 1980.
C.A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 199 U. S. App. D.C. 9, 615 F. 2d 1368.
holding statutory claims to an apparatus for analyzing seismic signals including mathematically described means for "sonogramming", "dividing", and "plotting"
Summary of this case from Arrhythmia Research Technology v. CorazonixFull title:DIAMOND, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS v. HIRSCHFELD ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 23, 1981
Based upon the uncertainties involved in the Court of Claims process, plaintiffs request that we order the…
United States v. Michelena-OrovioOne line of cases, starting with United States v. Cadena, 5 Cir. 1978, 585 F.2d 1252, has held that the…