From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Di Tommaso v. Brookhattan Utilities, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 11, 1972
40 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

December 11, 1972


Three judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, one in each of the first three above-entitled actions, entered March 30, 1972, March 29, 1972 and April 3, 1972, respectively, affirmed, with one bill of costs, jointly to respondents appearing separately in said actions, and jointly against appellants therein. In the fourth above-entitled action, judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered April 24, 1972, affirmed, without costs. The refusal of the trial court to charge the jury that the State trooper was a disinterested witness was harmless error. Munder, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Di Tommaso v. Brookhattan Utilities, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 11, 1972
40 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Di Tommaso v. Brookhattan Utilities, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY DI TOMMASO, Respondent, v. BROOKHATTAN UTILITIES, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1972

Citations

40 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Although an insurance company in…

DI TOMMASO v. BROOKHATTAN UTILITIES

Decided March 14, 1973 Appeal from (2d dept.: 40 A.D.2d 989) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO…