From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Di Miceli v. State Parole Board

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 31, 1954
105 A.2d 525 (N.J. 1954)

Opinion

Submitted May 24, 1954 —

Decided May 31, 1954.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Rosario Di Miceli, in propria persona. Mr. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Deputy Attorney-General, for the respondent ( Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Goldmann in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and BRENNAN — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Di Miceli v. State Parole Board

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 31, 1954
105 A.2d 525 (N.J. 1954)
Case details for

Di Miceli v. State Parole Board

Case Details

Full title:ROSARIO DI MICELI, APPELLANT, v. STATE PAROLE BOARD, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 31, 1954

Citations

105 A.2d 525 (N.J. 1954)
105 A.2d 525

Citing Cases

Trantino v. Department of Corrections

[ 28 N.J. Super. at 524-525; citations omitted] See also, Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 97 S.Ct. 2290, 53…

State v. Davis

Parole is not a constitutional right but an act of leniency or grace and a device for the protection of…