Opinion
Submitted May 31, 1935 —
Decided October 9, 1935.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 112 N.J.L. 19.
For the appellant, Ernest S. Glickman and Philip Windkos.
For the respondent, David T. Wilentz, attorney-general.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.