From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D.H.M. Industries v. Central Port Warehouse

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 2, 1974
64 N.J. 548 (N.J. 1974)

Opinion

Argued March 19, 1974 —

Decided April 2, 1974.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 127 N.J. Super. 499.

Mr. Burton T. Cohen, argued the cause for appellant ( Walter Henry Jones, attorney).

Mr. David J. Goldberg, argued the cause for respondent D.H.M. Industries, Inc. ( Messrs. Warren, Goldberg Berman, attorneys).


The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority's per curiam opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

D.H.M. Industries v. Central Port Warehouse

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 2, 1974
64 N.J. 548 (N.J. 1974)
Case details for

D.H.M. Industries v. Central Port Warehouse

Case Details

Full title:D.H.M. INDUSTRIES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 2, 1974

Citations

64 N.J. 548 (N.J. 1974)
318 A.2d 19

Citing Cases

Wingate Inns Int'l, Inc. v. P.G.S., LLC

Naporano Assoc., L.P. v. B&P Builders, 705 A.2d 1123, 1127 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998). New Jersey law…

Talcott v. H. Corenzwit and Company

The estimation of damages resulting from any breach of the drop-in-price clause can hardly be viewed as…