From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dewsnap v. Matthews

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Feb 1, 1907
53 Misc. 48 (N.Y. Misc. 1907)

Opinion

February, 1907.

Paul Gross (Herman Kahn, of counsel), for motion.

Alfred T. Davison, opposed.


I think it sufficiently appears from the filed papers that the persons now seeking to bring on the appeal applied for leave to be made parties defendant, which application was denied. They are the owners of the equity of redemption of the property of which a receiver has been appointed, and should be permitted to bring on their appeal from the order denying them leave to come in as parties. 2 Encyc. Pl. Pr. 152, 153; Nat. Park Bank v. Goddard, 48 N.Y. St. Repr. 744. The motion to compel acceptance of the notice of appeal is, therefore, granted, with ten dollars costs to abide the final event of the action.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs to abide final event of action.


Summaries of

Dewsnap v. Matthews

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Feb 1, 1907
53 Misc. 48 (N.Y. Misc. 1907)
Case details for

Dewsnap v. Matthews

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE G. DEWSNAP, Plaintiff, v . MOSES MATTHEWS et al., Defendants

Court:Supreme Court, New York Special Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1907

Citations

53 Misc. 48 (N.Y. Misc. 1907)
102 N.Y.S. 945

Citing Cases

City of St. Louis v. Silk

This is the view adopted by several of the courts in foreign jurisdictions. Hill et al. v. Alfalfa Seed…