From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Devey v. State of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 18, 2006
31 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-08802.

July 18, 2006.

In a claim, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Mignano, J.), dated July 14, 2005, which granted the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the claim.

Before: Florio, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Court of Claims properly granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the claim. Under the facts alleged by the claimant, the actions complained of were judicial acts and therefore were protected by the doctrine of judicial immunity ( see Matter of Covillion v Town of New Windsor, 123 AD2d 763, 763-764; Sassower v Finnerty, 96 AD2d 585, 586). The State "may not be held liable for the actions of a state-employed judge where, as here, those actions are cloaked with judicial immunity" ( Montesano v State of New York, 11 AD3d 436).

The claimant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Devey v. State of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 18, 2006
31 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Devey v. State of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:PETER F. DAVEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 18, 2006

Citations

31 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5745
817 N.Y.S.2d 918

Citing Cases

Shahid v. State

While there is a narrow exception to such immunity if there "lacks any jurisdiction supporting judicial…

Sarra v. State

Finally, claimant has also failed to establish that no other cause of action is available as an avenue of…