From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deutsche Bank v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2009
66 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-08812.

October 20, 2009.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Kimberlee M. Young and Anthony T. Young appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated July 15, 2008, which denied their motion, inter alia, to vacate a final judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated March 24, 2008.

Clair Gjertsen, Scarsdale, N.Y. (Ira S. Clair of counsel), for appellants.

Steven J. Baum, P.C., Amherst, N.Y. (Suzanne E. Panara and Caren L. Samplin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Florio, Miller and Austin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the Supreme Court did not err in determining that they waived the issue of standing by failing to timely appear or answer ( see CPLR 3211 [a] [3]; [e]; HSBC Bank, USA v Dammond, 59 AD3d 679; Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v Mastropaolo, 42 AD3d 239).

In light of this determination, we need not reach the appellants' remaining contention.


Summaries of

Deutsche Bank v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2009
66 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Deutsche Bank v. Young

Case Details

Full title:DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Respondent, v. KIMBERLEE M. YOUNG et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7578
886 N.Y.S.2d 619

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Martin

The Court further held that "an argument that a plaintiff lacks standing, if not asserted in the defendant's…

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Martin

The Court further held that "an argument that a plaintiff lacks standing, if not asserted in the defendant's…