From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dethlefson Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 28, 1969
434 Pa. 431 (Pa. 1969)

Summary

appearing as a witness is not the participation necessary to establish a right to review

Summary of this case from Matter of Brown

Opinion

May 7, 1969.

May 28, 1969.

Appeals — Parties — Standing — Zoning case — Failure to participate in proceedings before zoning board or on appeal to common pleas — Act of July 31, 1968, P. L. (1969) ___.

1. One who has not participated in proceedings before a zoning board upon an application for a variance or in an appeal to the common pleas court has no standing to appeal from the judgment of the lower court. [433]

2. Under § 1003 of the Act of July 31, 1968, P. L. (1969) ___, one who has not participated as a party before the zoning board must intervene under § 1006 to become a party in the court of common pleas proceedings. [433]

3. Appearing as a witness in a court is not the participation necessary to establish a right to review. [433]

Argued May 7, 1969. Before BELL, C. J., JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS and POMEROY, JJ.

Appeal, No. 336, Jan. T., 1969, from order of Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, No. 5284 of 1968, in re appeal of Anthony Greco Dethlefson et al. from order of Board of Zoning Adjustment of Upper Darby Township. Appeal quashed.

Proceedings upon appeal from decision of zoning board of adjustment denying application for a variance. Before GORBEY, J.

Order entered reversing decision of the board and directing the issuance of a building permit. Owners of neighboring properties appealed.

William J. O'Brien, for appellants.

Donald J. Orlowsky, for appellees.


Appellants, neighboring landowners to the property for which a variance was allowed, did not participate in the proceedings before the Board of Zoning Adjustment of Upper Darby Township or in the appeal to the common pleas court. They, nevertheless, have taken an appeal from the judgment of the lower court reversing the order of the Board. There is no authority to permit standing to take this appeal and it is therefore quashed.

The Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code of July 31, 1968, P. L. (1969) ___, § 1003, grants a right to appeal to the court of common pleas to "any party" before the Board as well as any officer or agency of the municipality. Not having participated as a party before the Board, appellants must intervene under § 1006 of the same act to become a party in the court of common pleas proceedings. These particular appellants were relegated thereunder to the rights of intervention under the Rules of Civil Procedure and, not having filed a petition in accordance therewith, nor having otherwise been permitted to intervene, were not before the lower court. Never having been a party before the lower court, appellants can not now obtain appellate review from this Court. Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, supra, § 1012. Alloy Metal Wire Company, Inc., Appeal, 329 Pa. 429, 432, 198 A. 448 (1938).

There is but one way to become a party litigant in a court and that is by appearing in the proceedings. Appearing as a witness is not the participation necessary to establish appellants' right to review.

Appeal quashed.


Summaries of

Dethlefson Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 28, 1969
434 Pa. 431 (Pa. 1969)

appearing as a witness is not the participation necessary to establish a right to review

Summary of this case from Matter of Brown
Case details for

Dethlefson Appeal

Case Details

Full title:Dethlefson Appeal

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 28, 1969

Citations

434 Pa. 431 (Pa. 1969)
254 A.2d 6

Citing Cases

Northampton R.A. v. North. Twp. Bd. of S

Appearing as a witness is not the participation necessary to establish appellants' right to review."…

Gilbert v. Montgomery Twp. Z.H.B

Moreover, the law is clear that objecting private citizens, although as clearly entitled as the municipality…