From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeStefano v. Amtad New York Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 17, 2000

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered November 30, 1998, which in an action for personal injuries by a laborer against the owner and general contractor of a construction site, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Joseph C. Ballard, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Mark A. Everett, for defendants-respondents.

NARDELLI, J.P., TOM, WALLACH, RUBIN, ANDRIAS, JJ.


Plaintiff, an electrician assigned to turn on the power at the construction site before the other trades arrived, and who was the first person to enter the site on the morning of the accident, has no cause of action under Labor Law § 241 Lab.(6) and12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) absent any evidence tending to show that "someone within the chain of the construction project" had notice of the overnight accumulation of snow on the ramp on which he slipped (see, Rizzuto v. Wenger Contr. Co., 91 N.Y.2d 343, 350, 351). Nor does plaintiff have a cause of action under Labor Law § 240 Lab.(1) since the ramp, which was positioned at the entrance of the building and rose to a maximum of 12 inches, did not present an elevation hazard (see,Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co., 78 N.Y.2d 509, 514-515).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

DeStefano v. Amtad New York Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

DeStefano v. Amtad New York Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GENNARO DeSTEFANO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMTAD NEW YORK, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 34

Citing Cases

Torkel v. NYU Hospitals Center

Whatever its merit, this new argument is not properly before this Court because defendants' failure to raise…

Vrlaku v. Plaza Constr. Corp.

There is no showing that defendant had any knowledge of the alleged unsafe condition or that the particular…