From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dessel v. Dessel

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 22, 1973
62 N.J. 141 (N.J. 1973)

Summary

noting that New Jersey courts generally require that a constructive trust be established by clear and convincing evidence

Summary of this case from Russo v. Vaughn

Opinion

Argued January 8, 1973 —

Decided January 22, 1973.

Mr. Richard F. Plechner argued the cause for the appellants ( Mr. Robert G. Hampson, on the brief).

Mr. Roger H. McGlynn argued the cause for the respondents ( Messrs. McGlynn, Stein Eberiel, attorneys).


The Appellate Division's judgment of reversal and remand is affirmed, essentially for the reasons set forth in its per curiam reported at 122 N.J. Super. 119 (1972).

For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, HALL and MOUNTAIN, and Judges CONFORD, SULLIVAN and LEWIS — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Dessel v. Dessel

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 22, 1973
62 N.J. 141 (N.J. 1973)

noting that New Jersey courts generally require that a constructive trust be established by clear and convincing evidence

Summary of this case from Russo v. Vaughn
Case details for

Dessel v. Dessel

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD M. DESSEL AND ARLENE B. BOGEN, EXECUTORS UNDER THE LAST WILL AND…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 22, 1973

Citations

62 N.J. 141 (N.J. 1973)
299 A.2d 409

Citing Cases

Ross v. Annunziata

Finally, Ross failed to present sufficient evidence to justify a trial on his claim for a constructive trust,…

Pascale v. Pascale

David had the burden of showing by clear and convincing evidence that his father intended to make a gift and…