From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Desmond v. Warden Perry Phelps

United States District Court, D. Delaware
Mar 30, 2010
Civ. No. 10-165-JJF (D. Del. Mar. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. No. 10-165-JJF.

March 30, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff Christopher R. Desmond, an inmate at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Smyrna, Delaware, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He proceeds pro se, but did not pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

The Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA") provides that a prisoner cannot bring a new civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action in forma pauperis if he has three or more times in the past, while incarcerated, brought a civil action or appeal in federal court that was dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). A case dismissed as frivolous prior to the enactment of the PLRA (i.e., April 26, 1996) is counted when applying the "three strikes rule". Keener v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation Parole, 128 F.3d 143 (3d Cir. 1997). An exception is made to the "three strikes rule", when the prisoner is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. A prisoner who is not proceeding in forma pauperis may file a new civil action or appeal even if that prisoner has three or more dismissals described in 28 U.S.C. 1915(g).

Plaintiff, while incarcerated, has filed than three civil actions that have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Desmond v. Brady, Civ. No. 03-1046-JJF (D. Del. Sept. 24, 2004); Desmond v. Snyder, Civ. No. 95-205-SLR (D. Del. Mar. 30, 1995); Desmond v. Stafford, Civ. No. 86-53-LON (D. Del. June 3, 1986). Therefore, Plaintiff may not file another civil action in forma pauperis while incarcerated unless he is in "imminent danger of serious physical injury" at the time of the filing of his complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307, 311 (3d Cir. 2001). After reviewing his Complaint, the Court finds that it does not meet that standard. Based upon the foregoing, Plaintiff is not excused from the restrictions under § 1915(g), and he may not proceed in forma pauperis.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's may not proceed in forma pauperis.

2. Plaintiff is given thirty (30) days from the date of this order to pay the $350.00 filing fee. If Plaintiff does not pay the filing fee within that time, the Complaint shall be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).


Summaries of

Desmond v. Warden Perry Phelps

United States District Court, D. Delaware
Mar 30, 2010
Civ. No. 10-165-JJF (D. Del. Mar. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Desmond v. Warden Perry Phelps

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER R. DESMOND, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN PERRY PHELPS and MIKE LITTLE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Delaware

Date published: Mar 30, 2010

Citations

Civ. No. 10-165-JJF (D. Del. Mar. 30, 2010)

Citing Cases

In re Petition of Desmond

Under 10 Del. C. § 8804(f), an inmate may not proceed in forma pauperis if he previously filed three or more…

In re Petition of Desmond

Under 10 Del. C. § 8804(f), an inmate may not proceed in forma pauperis if he previously filed three or more…