From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeSisto College, Inc. v. Line

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 15, 1989
888 F.2d 766 (11th Cir. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-3133.

November 15, 1989.

Michael B. Roitman, Evan Slavitt, Roderick MaCleish, Jr., Fine Ambrogne, Boston, Mass., Richard B. Warren, Fleming, Haile Shaw, P.A., N. Palm Beach, Fla., Stephen H. Durant, Martin, Ade, Birchfield Mickler, P.A., Jacksonville, Fla., Jackson O. Brownlee, Tavares, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Keith R. Mitnik, John M. Robertson, J. Stephen McDonald, Robertson Williams Mitnik, Orlando, Fla., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Middle District of Florida; Susan H. Black, Judge.

Before FAY and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges, and ALLGOOD, Senior District Judge.

Honorable Clarence W. Allgood, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.


The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED based upon and for the reasons set forth in the exhaustive and scholarly Opinion and Order found at 706 F. Supp. 1479 (M.D.Fla. 1989).


Summaries of

DeSisto College, Inc. v. Line

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 15, 1989
888 F.2d 766 (11th Cir. 1989)
Case details for

DeSisto College, Inc. v. Line

Case Details

Full title:DeSISTO COLLEGE, INC. AND LOREN E. HORNER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS v. THOMAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Nov 15, 1989

Citations

888 F.2d 766 (11th Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Zopf v. Singletary

Vocelle v. Knight Bros. Paper Co., 118 So.2d 664, 667 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). If the legislature had intended…

U.S. v. Williams

"Courts are not free to read into the language what is not there, but rather should apply the statute as…