From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Desiderio v. Ochs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 23, 2002
294 A.D.2d 241 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1159, M2171

May 23, 2002.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered June 4, 2001, awarding plaintiff damages against defendant hospital in the principal amount of $50,123,293, before structuring, including $1.5 million for past pain and suffering and $3 million for future pain and suffering over 55 years, upon plaintiff's stipulation, in lieu of a new trial on damages, reducing the jury's award of damages in the principal amount of $79,873,293, before structuring, including $2 million for past pain and suffering, $30 million for future pain and suffering and $40 million for future nursing care, and, for purposes of structuring pursuant CPLR article 50-A, determining the total present value of the award to be $28,873,490, before interest, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

THOMAS A. MOORE, for Plaintiff-respondent.

ANTHONY M. SOLA, for Defendant-appellant.

FRANCES A. CIARDULLO, STEVEN J. AHMUTY, JR. CHRISTINA M. WHITE, for Amici Curiae.

Williams, P.J., Buckley, Rosenberger, Lerner, JJ.


The awards for past and future pain and suffering, as reduced by the trial court, do not deviate from what is reasonable compensation for the severe brain damage sustained by plaintiff when he was four years, taking into account his preexisting impairments since birth. In addition, as the trial court indicated, defendant's evidence that the care plaintiff needs can be provided by licensed practical nurses is not so weighty as to warrant judicial "usurpation" of the jury's finding that plaintiff requires permanent, around-the-clock care by registered nurses. The methodology used to structure the judgment is in accordance with CPLR 5031(e) and Bryant v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp. ( 93 N.Y.2d 592), and should not be disturbed. We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be unavailing.

Motion seeking leave to file Amici Curiae brief granted.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Desiderio v. Ochs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 23, 2002
294 A.D.2d 241 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Desiderio v. Ochs

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL DESIDERIO, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DR. ROBERT L. OCHS, ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 23, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 241 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
741 N.Y.S.2d 865

Citing Cases

Mendez v. New York & Presbyterian Hosp.

As modified by the Appellate Division, future medical expenses accounted for 55% of the judgment. Finally,…

Mendez v. New York Presbyt. Hosp.

As modified by the Appellate Division, future medical expenses accounted for 55% of the judgment. Finally,…