From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Derrick Damon Rainwater Fed. Reg v. Werlich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Aug 25, 2014
DOCKET NO. 14-CV-761, SEC. P (W.D. La. Aug. 25, 2014)

Summary

finding that § 2241 relief was unavailable through the savings clause of § 2255(e) because Rosemond has not been declared retroactively applicable by Supreme Court

Summary of this case from Aquil v. Butler

Opinion

DOCKET NO. 14-CV-761, SEC. P

08-25-2014

DERRICK DAMON RAINWATER FED. REG. #25805077 v. WARDEN WERLICH


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KIRK

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, including the objections filed by Petitioner, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Rainwater's petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2241 be denied and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, at Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 25th day of August, 2014

/s/_________

TOM STAGG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Derrick Damon Rainwater Fed. Reg v. Werlich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Aug 25, 2014
DOCKET NO. 14-CV-761, SEC. P (W.D. La. Aug. 25, 2014)

finding that § 2241 relief was unavailable through the savings clause of § 2255(e) because Rosemond has not been declared retroactively applicable by Supreme Court

Summary of this case from Aquil v. Butler
Case details for

Derrick Damon Rainwater Fed. Reg v. Werlich

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK DAMON RAINWATER FED. REG. #25805077 v. WARDEN WERLICH

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Aug 25, 2014

Citations

DOCKET NO. 14-CV-761, SEC. P (W.D. La. Aug. 25, 2014)

Citing Cases

Beale v. Andrews

Additionally, the Supreme Court has not made its holding in Rosemond retroactive on collateral review. See…

Aquil v. Butler

This Court agrees with the approach taken in these cases and concludes that Rosemond does not apply…