From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Derechinsky v. Epstein

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 447 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided February 1st, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 98 N.J. Eq. 79.

Messrs. Stillwell Stillwell, for the respondents.

Messrs. Lazarus, Brenner Vickers, for the appellants.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Derechinsky v. Epstein

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 447 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Derechinsky v. Epstein

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP DERECHINSKY, respondent, v. LOUIS EPSTEIN et al., appellants

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 447 (N.J. 1926)

Citing Cases

Warren v. New Jersey Zinc Co.

If it were a mortgage the bank held as security, instead of shares of stock, and the amount of the mortgage…

Rose v. Rein

While an assignee of a mortgage has a right to foreclose same in his own name, such right is not an exclusive…