From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Depinet v. Bunting

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 23, 2015
CASE NO.: 3:14CV1366 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 23, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:14CV1366

09-23-2015

ANDREW J. DEPINET, Petitioner, v. JASON BUNTING, Respondent.


ORDER AND DECISION

The Court has examined the Report and Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge submitted in this matter on June 19, 2014. Doc. 12. Upon due consideration, and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the Report and recommended findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates them herein. Therefore, it is ordered that petition is hereby DENIED.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Court's decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

September 23, 2015

/s/ John R . Adams

JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Depinet v. Bunting

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 23, 2015
CASE NO.: 3:14CV1366 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Depinet v. Bunting

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW J. DEPINET, Petitioner, v. JASON BUNTING, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 23, 2015

Citations

CASE NO.: 3:14CV1366 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 23, 2015)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Turner

Petitioner thereby committed a procedural default and has waived his claims for review in these proceedings.…

Robinson v. Warden, Pickaway Corr. Inst.

Petitioner thereby has waived this claim for review in these proceedings. See Smith v. State of Ohio Dept. of…