From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DePaul v. Coastal Electric Construction Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 27, 2014
114 A.D.3d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-27

William DePAUL, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents–Appellants, v. N.Y. BRUSH LLC, et al., Defendants–Appellants–Respondents, Ruttura & Sons Construction Co., Inc., Defendant–Respondent. N.Y. Brush LLC, et al., Third–Party Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Coastal Electric Construction Corp., Third–Party Defendant, Ruttura & Sons Construction Co., Inc., Third–Party Defendant–Respondent.


Editor's Note: The opinion of the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, in DePaul v. N.Y. Brush LLC, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 981 N.Y.S.2d 75, was withdrawn from the bound volume because it was recalled and vacated. For substituted opinion, see 2014 WL 4452687.


Summaries of

DePaul v. Coastal Electric Construction Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 27, 2014
114 A.D.3d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

DePaul v. Coastal Electric Construction Corp.

Case Details

Full title:William DePAUL, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents–Appellants, v. N.Y…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 27, 2014

Citations

114 A.D.3d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1386
981 N.Y.S.2d 75

Citing Cases

Onofre v. Bd. of Managers of the Downtown Condo.

Therefore, to be entitled to indemnification, Maxons Restorations must only establish that it is not being…

Mayer v. Conrad

We therefore conclude that the court properly denied those parts of the motions of defendants and Fisher…