Summary
affirming district court finding that this regulation and its rationale do not violate the First Amendment
Summary of this case from Hoglan v. RobinsonOpinion
No. 12-6413
06-06-2012
ERIC JOSEPH DEPAOLA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LESLIE FLEMING, Major/Chief of Security; PUBLICATION REVIEW COMMITTEE, Virginia Department of Corrections; TRACY RAY, Warden, Red Onion State Prison; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Operations, Virginia Department of Corrections; RICHARD ROWLETTE, Defendants - Appellees.
Eric Joseph DePaola, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:10-cv-00561-SGW-RSB)
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Joseph DePaola, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Eric Joseph DePaola appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. DePaola v. Fleming, No. 7:10-cv-00561-SGW-RSB (W.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED