From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Denbow v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Texas. November, 1946
Nov 13, 1946
199 S.W.2d 651 (Tex. 1946)

Opinion

No. A-868.

Decided November 13, 1946.

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from Waller County.

The suit was brought by the Standard Accident Insurance Company against H.E. Denbow in the nature of an appeal from an award of the Industrial Accident Board made to the said Denbow as compensation for accidental injuries alleged to have been sustained by him in the course of his employment as a welder with the Stern-Rogers Manufacturing Company, who carried compensation insurance with the plaintiff. A judgment based on special issues was rendered in favor of the defendant, Denbow, for compensation at the rate of $20.00 per week for a total period of 306 weeks less seven weeks compensation which had been previously paid. That judgment was reversed and the cause remanded by the Court of Civil Appeals, 183 S.W.2d 680. The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and the case was remanded to the trial court, 143 Tex. 455, 186 S.W.2d 236. Upon the second trial Denbow recovered judgment for six weeks at the rate of $20.00 per week, and for one hundred and forty-four weeks at the rate of $12.35 per week, less $140.00 for the seven weeks previously paid. The Court of Civil Appeals reformed that judgment and reduced the compensation from $12.35 per week to five dollars, but otherwise affirmed it, 193 S.W.2d 301. The case has now again come to the Supreme Court.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is reversed and that of the trial court is affirmed.

Jimmy Phillips, of Angleton, and B.C. Johnson, of Houston, for petitioner.

The Court of Civil Appeals erred in reforming the judgment of the trial court. Southern Underwriters v. Boswell, 138 Tex. 255, 158 S.W.2d 280; Maryland Casualty Co. v. Boverie, 37 S.W.2d 310; Employers Lloyds v. Scott, 138 S.W.2d 262.

Kemper Cramer, of Houston, for respondents.

The trial court incorrectly figured the amount of compensation due claimant for his partial injury. Texas Emp. Ins. Assn. v. Shilling, 279 S.W. 865; Texas Emp. Ins. Assn. v. Moreno, 277 S.W. 84; Lumbermen's Reciprocal Asso. v. Pollard, 10 S.W.2d 982.


This case was first appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals at Galveston, and its opinion is reported in 183 S.W.2d 680. This Court granted a writ of error, and the opinion of the Supreme Court is reported in 143 Tex. 455, 186 S.W.2d 236. On the second trial the jury found as follows:

(a) That Denbow's total disability from January 8, 1943, to January 20, 1943, was the result of injury to his body as well as an injury to his life wrist; (b) that following the termination of such total disability on February 20, 1943, he suffered partial disability; (c) that partial disability after February 20, 1943, was confined to his left wrist and did not result from any injury to any other portion of his body; (d) and that such wrist disability did not extend to or affect any other portion of his body; (e) that the partial disability to Denbow's left wrist was permanent; (f) that it amounted to a 25% permanent partial disability to his left hand and wrist.

On these findings the trial court rendered judgment for Denbow for six weeks at the rate of $20.00 per week, and one hundred forty-four weeks at the rate of $12.35 per week, less the sum of $140.00, which had theretofore been paid.

On appeal the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals reformed the judgment of the trial court and reduced the compensation rate from $12.35 per week to $5.00 per week, and rendered judgment for the permanent partial loss of use of the left wrist for the remaining one hundred forty-four weeks. 193 S.W.2d 301.

The average weekly wage of Denbow was agreed to be $82.34.

Denbow makes two contentions in this Court. He insists that he is entitled to six weeks for temporary total disability at the rate of $20.00 per week and permanent partial disability for a period of three hundred weeks at the rate of $12.35 per week, under Sections 10 and 11 of Article 8306. He also insists that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in reducing the judgment to $5.00 per week for one hundred forty-four weeks.

The first contention is without merit. The findings of the jury of total disability for a period of six weeks entitled Denbow to the maximum payment of $20.00 per week, regardless of the nature of his injury, that is, whether general or specific. The finding of the jury to the effect that the injury to the wrist did not extend to other parts of the body limits Denbow's right to a recovery for a specific injury to the wrist. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n. v. Maledon, 27 S.W.2d 151; Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Munday, 44 S.W.2d 926, and authorities there cited.

His compensation must be calculated under Section 12 of Article 8306, which provides weekly compensation "for the loss of a hand sixty per cent of the average weekly wage during one hundred fifty weeks."

In the case of Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n. v. Holmes, 145 Tex. 158, 196 S.W.2d 390, the correct method of calculating compensation for a specific injury was decided by a majority of this Court to be in accordance with the method employed by the trial court. This opinion was handed down on June 19, 1946, and the motion for rehearing was overruled on October 9, 1946. It is now the settled law of this state.

Accordingly, we must reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Opinion delivered November 13, 1946.


Summaries of

Denbow v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Texas. November, 1946
Nov 13, 1946
199 S.W.2d 651 (Tex. 1946)
Case details for

Denbow v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:H.E. DENBOW v. STANDARD ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Texas. November, 1946

Date published: Nov 13, 1946

Citations

199 S.W.2d 651 (Tex. 1946)
199 S.W.2d 651

Citing Cases

Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Whitaker

See: Great American Indemnity Co. v. Sams, Tex.Civ.App., 170 S.W.2d 564, affirmed at 142 Tex. 121, 176 S.W.2d…

Peoples v. U.S. Cas. Co.

This calculation is in accordance with the late decisions of our courts. See Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v.…