From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delvalle v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 21, 2014
117 A.D.3d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-05-21

Danny DELVALLE, plaintiff, v. MERCEDES BENZ USA, LLC, et al., defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants; Chetum Singh, et al., third-party defendants, Douglas S. Kent, et al., third-party defendants-respondents.

Buckley Law Group, P.A., New York, N.Y. (Alan R. Levy of counsel), for defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants. Wade, Clark & Mulcahy, New York, N.Y. (Lora H. Gleicher of counsel), for third-party defendants-respondents.


Buckley Law Group, P.A., New York, N.Y. (Alan R. Levy of counsel), for defendants third-party plaintiffs-appellants.Wade, Clark & Mulcahy, New York, N.Y. (Lora H. Gleicher of counsel), for third-party defendants-respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants third-party plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J.), dated February 15, 2013, which granted the motion of the third-party defendants Douglas S. Kent and King Freeze Mechanical Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint insofar as asserted against them.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the third-party defendants Douglas S. Kent and King Freeze Mechanical Corp. (hereinafter together the respondents) for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, which sought contribution and indemnification, insofar as asserted against them. The respondents met their prima facie burden of establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the plaintiff was injured in the course of his employment with King Freeze Mechanical Corp., and that the plaintiff's injuries did not constitute a “grave injury” within the meaning of Workers' Compensation Law § 11 ( see Szczepanski v. Dandrea Constr. Corp., 90 A.D.3d 642, 644, 934 N.Y.S.2d 432;Kitkas v. Windsor Place Corp., 72 A.D.3d 649, 897 N.Y.S.2d 652;Goode v. Woodside, 74 A.D.3d 1279, 904 N.Y.S.2d 196). In opposition, the defendants third-party plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. BALKIN, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and HALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Delvalle v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 21, 2014
117 A.D.3d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Delvalle v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Danny DELVALLE, plaintiff, v. MERCEDES BENZ USA, LLC, et al., defendants…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 21, 2014

Citations

117 A.D.3d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
117 A.D.3d 894
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 3647

Citing Cases

McIntosh v. Ronit Realty, LLC

Here, in support of its motion, A.B.C. Tank established, prima facie, that there was no written agreement…