From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delta Bank v. Malamud

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Nov 13, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-6688 (SRC) (D.N.J. Nov. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-6688 (SRC)

11-13-2012

DELTA BANK, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER MALAMUD and MARTA MALAMUD, Defendants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OPINION & ORDER

CHESLER, U.S.D.J.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Delta Bank's application for an Order to Show Cause why an injunction should not be issued, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, to restrain Defendants Alexander and Marta Malamud from disbursing and/or misappropriating funds or assets from funds loaned by Delta Bank. The Court has reviewed the papers filed by Plaintiff in support of its application for an Order to Show Cause and concluded that Plaintiff has not demonstrated, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 65.1, that its request should proceed in an expedited fashion, or that the issuance of an ex parte Order is justified. Local Civil Rule 65.1 states that "no order to show cause to bring on a matter for hearing will be granted except on a clear and specific showing by affidavit or verified pleading of good and sufficient reasons why a procedure other than by notice of motion is necessary."

Plaintiff's supporting affidavits indicate that the matter in dispute here has been the subject of proceedings in London's High Court of Justice, Queens Division, dating at least as far back as May 2012. Given that the core of this dispute has been ongoing for at least six months, Plaintiff has not convincingly demonstrated why the preliminary injunction cannot be adequately heard under a normal briefing schedule.

The Court will therefore deny Plaintiff's application for an Order to Show Cause. Provided that Defendants are properly served with the summons, complaint, and moving papers, Plaintiff may re-file its application for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1.

For these reasons,

IT IS on this 13th day of November, 2012

ORDERED that Plaintiff's application for an order to show cause [docket entry 5] be and hereby is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [docket entry 5] be and hereby is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

______________________

STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Delta Bank v. Malamud

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Nov 13, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-6688 (SRC) (D.N.J. Nov. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Delta Bank v. Malamud

Case Details

Full title:DELTA BANK, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER MALAMUD and MARTA MALAMUD, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Nov 13, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-6688 (SRC) (D.N.J. Nov. 13, 2012)

Citing Cases

Perez v. Pena

In other words, a plaintiff's filings must "convincingly demonstrate[ ] why the preliminary injunction cannot…