From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delos Ins. v. Smith Laquercia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 26, 2011
84 A.D.3d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

Nos. 5179, 5180.

May 26, 2011.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered April 13, 2010, dismissing the complaint, pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered April 9, 2010, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7), unanimously modified, on the law, to reinstate the complaint as to plaintiff Delos Insurance Company, formerly known as Sirius America Insurance (Delos/Sirius), and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered November 24, 2010, which denied plaintiffs' motion to renew and reargue, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Rubin, Fiorella Friedman LLP, New York (Denise A. Palmeri of counsel), for appellants.

Steinberg Cavaliere, LLP, White Plains (Steven A. Coploff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.


The complaint should be reinstated as to plaintiff Delos/Sirius because, accepting the facts as alleged in the complaint as true and affording plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable inference, it sufficiently asserts viable causes of action for malpractice ( see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). Delos/Sirius has standing to pursue its claims against defendant since it is undisputed that defendant represented Delos/Sirius in one declaratory judgment action. As to the second declaratory judgment action, the record supports the conclusion that a "near" privity relationship existed between the two ( see State of Cal. Pub. Employees' Retirement Sys. v Shearman Sterling, 95 NY2d 427, 434; Federal Ins. Co. v North Am. Specialty Ins. Co., 47 AD3d 52, 60; Allianz Underwriters Ins. Co. v Landmark Ins. Co., 13 AD3d 172, 175).


However, the complaint should be dismissed as to Delos/Sirius's insured coplaintiffs Dennis Organization, Inc. and Rick Dennis, because it fails to allege they suffered damages as a result of defendant's alleged negligence that were not recompensed after Delos/Sirius, their insurer, paid to settle the underlying personal injury action ( see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442-443; Stawski v Pasternack, Popish Reif P.C., 54 AD3d 619, 620).

[Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 30798(U).]


Summaries of

Delos Ins. v. Smith Laquercia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 26, 2011
84 A.D.3d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Delos Ins. v. Smith Laquercia

Case Details

Full title:DELOS INSURANCE COMPANY, Formerly Known as SIRIUS AMERICA INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 26, 2011

Citations

84 A.D.3d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4391
923 N.Y.S.2d 522

Citing Cases

Piccarreto v. Mura

Thus, even if an offset were granted in an amount equal to what the wife must return to the plaintiff, the…

Grober v. Bronson

That a Form 1099 tax return shows that, between 2009 and 2011, plaintiffs were paid more than $1 million by…