From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Delorme Publ'g Co. v. Briartek Ip, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 12, 2015
622 F. App'x 912 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Summary

affirming invalidation of claims 1, 2, 5–12, 17, 34, and 35 of U.S. Patent No. 7,991,380

Summary of this case from DBN Holding, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n

Opinion

2015-1169 2015-1241

11-12-2015

DELORME PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC., DELORME INREACH, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. BRIARTEK IP, INC., Defendant-Appellant

PETER J. BRANN, Brann & Isaacson, Lewiston, ME, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by STACY O. STITHAM, DAVID SWETNAM-BURLAND; EDWARD A. PENNINGTON, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP, Washington, DC. JOHN ROBERT FUISZ, The Fuisz-Kundu Group LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by SUDIP KUMAR KUNDU.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:13-cv-00640-LMB-TRJ, Judge Leonie M. Brinkema. PETER J. BRANN, Brann & Isaacson, Lewiston, ME, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by STACY O. STITHAM, DAVID SWETNAM-BURLAND; EDWARD A. PENNINGTON, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP, Washington, DC. JOHN ROBERT FUISZ, The Fuisz-Kundu Group LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by SUDIP KUMAR KUNDU. Before MOORE, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

We affirm the decisions by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (1) denying BriarTek IP, Inc.'s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (2) denying BriarTek's motion to strike portions of DeLorme Publishing Company, Inc. and DeLorme InReach LLC's (collectively, "DeLorme") summary judgment briefing; (3) granting summary judgment of invalidity of claims 1, 2, 5-12, 17, 34, and 35 of U.S. Patent No. 7,991,380 for anticipation and obviousness; and (4) awarding costs to DeLorme. We note that despite the district court's general statement in its summary judgment order that the '380 patent is invalid, the parties agree this case is limited to claims 1, 2, 5-12, 17, 34, and 35 of the '380 patent and therefore only these claims are being held invalid.

AFFIRMED

COSTS

Costs to DeLorme.


Summaries of

Delorme Publ'g Co. v. Briartek Ip, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 12, 2015
622 F. App'x 912 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

affirming invalidation of claims 1, 2, 5–12, 17, 34, and 35 of U.S. Patent No. 7,991,380

Summary of this case from DBN Holding, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n
Case details for

Delorme Publ'g Co. v. Briartek Ip, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DELORME PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC., DELORME INREACH, LLC…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 12, 2015

Citations

622 F. App'x 912 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

DBN Holding, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n

Appellant DBN Holding, Inc. was formerly known as DeLorme Publishing Company, Inc. Appellant BDN LLC was…

DBN Holding, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n

On November 12, 2015, this court issued its decisions in both appeals. First, we summarily affirmed the…