From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Del Monte Dunes at Monterey v. Monterey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 28, 1997
127 F.3d 1149 (9th Cir. 1997)

Opinion

Nos. 94-16248, 94-16313

October 28, 1997

Before: J. Clifford Wallace and Edward Leavy, Circuit Judges, and Lourdes G. Baird, District Judge.

Honorable Lourdes G. Baird, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.


ORDER

The panel reheard oral argument in this case on August 6, 1996. The panel has voted not to amend its opinion. The panel has unanimously recommended that the suggestion for rehearing en banc be rejected.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge called for an en banc vote and a majority of the judges of the court has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).

The opinion in this case will not be amended, and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.


Summaries of

Del Monte Dunes at Monterey v. Monterey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 28, 1997
127 F.3d 1149 (9th Cir. 1997)
Case details for

Del Monte Dunes at Monterey v. Monterey

Case Details

Full title:DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., et al., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 28, 1997

Citations

127 F.3d 1149 (9th Cir. 1997)

Citing Cases

Tahoe-Sierra Preserv. v. Tahoe Planning Agency

However, the Ninth Circuit has indicated that this test may not be limited to cases involving exactions. In…

Nuance Commc’n, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.

In other words, it is insufficient that a single breach causes multiple effects; instead, “the plaintiff's…