From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deese v. Espy

Supreme Court of Alabama
Aug 28, 1969
226 So. 2d 332 (Ala. 1969)

Opinion

7 Div. 806.

August 28, 1969.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Etowah County, George Murphy, J.

Hawkins, Rhea Mitchell, and Larry H. Keener, Gadsden, for appellant.

In determining whether to grant an affirmative charge, the entire evidence must be viewed in its most favorable aspect to the opponent, and where this is done and a reasonable inference may be drawn adverse to the party requesting the charge, the charge is properly refused. Atlantic Coast Line Railway Co. v. McMoy, 261 Ala. 66, 73 So.2d 85; Crescent Amusement Co. v. Knight, 263 Ala. 445, 82 So.2d 919; Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. Jones, 267 Ala. 261, 101 So.2d 265, 74 A.L.R.2d 499; Casino Restaurant v. McWhorter, 35 Ala. App. 332, 46 So.2d 582. Only where there is no evidence tending to establish plaintiff's case may the court direct a verdict for defendant. Greyhound Corp. v. Brown, 269 Ala. 520, 113 So.2d 916; United Ins. Co. of America v. Ray, 275 Ala. 411, 155 So.2d 514; Tidmore v. Miller, 33 Ala. App. 243, 32 So.2d 769; Id. 249 Ala. 648, 32 So.2d 782. In civil cases question must go to jury if the evidence or reasonable inference therefrom furnishes a mere gleam, glimmer, spark, the least particle, the smallest trace, or a scintilla, in support of the theory. Brandwein v. Elliston, 268 Ala. 598, 109 So.2d 687; Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. Harris, 270 Ala. 390, 118 So.2d 727; South Highlands Infirmary v. Camp, 279 Ala. 1, 180 So.2d 904, 14 A.L.R.3d 1245.

Simmons McCrary, Lusk, Swann, Burns Stivender, Gadsden, for appellees.

The status of a social guest is that of a licensee. Morgan v. Kirkpatrick, 276 Ala. 7, 158 So.2d 650. The duty owed to a licensee is not to set traps or pitfalls for him, nor to willfully or wantonly injure him. Ala. Great So. Railroad Co. v. Campbell, 32 Ala. App. 348, 26 So.2d 124; Ala. Baptist Hospital Bd. v. Carter, 226 Ala. 109, 145 So. 443; Fowler Rental Equipment Co. v. Skipper, 276 Ala. 593, 165 So.2d 375.


The appellant is the mother of appellee Espy. She sued her son for injuries which she suffered in a fall at his home, charging that her fall and the injuries she suffered were "the direct and proximate consequence of the negligent manner in which Defendant maintained said premises by negligently permitting * * * loose block or blocks of wood, rock or other foreign materials to be situated at * * * doorway." The count also alleged that at the time and place complained of that the plaintiff was a guest or invitee of the defendant.

The defendant joined as a third-party defendant appellee Nations, who was the contractor remodeling the home of defendant Epsy at the time of the fall.

At the conclusion of the evidence the court gave, at the request of the defendant and the third-party defendant, the general affirmative charge. Judgment was entered on the verdict in favor of the defendants; the appellant filed a motion for a new trial, which was timely denied. This appeal is from the final judgment.

The evidence in the case is undisputed. The appellant went to the home of her son, at the invitation of her daughter-in-law. She was attempting to enter the house via the back door. There were no steps, as such, but instead wood blocks were serving as steps into the house. The plaintiff testified that all kinds of debris lay about as a result of the work being done on her son's house. The block turned over under the weight of appellant and she fell on her back, suffering a fracture.

The only contention made by appellant is that the court erred in giving at the request of the two defendants the affirmative charge, contending that in giving this charge, the court violated the scintilla rule. We cannot agree. The evidence in the case clearly establishes that the appellant was a social guest at the home of the defendant at the time of the accident.

In Morgan v. Kirkpatrick, 276 Ala. 7, 158 So.2d 650, this court for the first time held with the majority of jurisdictions, that a social guest is a mere licensee, entitled to no affirmative care to prepare the premises for his reception. The duty owed to a licensee is to refrain from putting traps in his way. Scoggins v. Atlantic Gulf Portland Cement Co., 179 Ala. 213, 60 So. 175. The record in this case is devoid of any evidence that the defendants breached a duty owing to the plaintiff. The trial court correctly granted the requests for the affirmative charge.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and COLEMAN and BLOODWORTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Deese v. Espy

Supreme Court of Alabama
Aug 28, 1969
226 So. 2d 332 (Ala. 1969)
Case details for

Deese v. Espy

Case Details

Full title:Lottie DEESE v. L. C. Joe ESPY et al

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Aug 28, 1969

Citations

226 So. 2d 332 (Ala. 1969)
226 So. 2d 332

Citing Cases

White v. Packer

In Alabama, a social guest has been defined as a licensee. Tolbert, supra; Standifer v. Pate, 291 Ala. 434,…

Johnson v. Harris

(Citations omitted; emphasis added.) Although in Deese v. Espy, 284 Ala. 551, 553, 226 So.2d 332, 333 (1969),…