From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DEE v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

February, 1927.

Present — Kelly, P.J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ.


Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers unanimously affirmed, with costs. The incontestability clause survived the death of the assured. ( Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hurni Packing Co., 263 U.S. 167.) Compliance by defendant with the Insurance Law would have avoided the question. There was no proof of a contest.

See Insurance Law, § 101, subd. 2, added by Laws of 1909, chap. 301, as amd. by Laws of 1921, chap. 407, and re-enacted by Laws of 1922, chap. 275; since amd. by Laws of 1923, chap. 28. — [REP.


Summaries of

DEE v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

DEE v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET DEE, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1927

Citations

219 App. Div. 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Citing Cases

Prudential Ins. Co. v. Ptohides

Support for that view will be found in some decisions (N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Feight, 29 Fed. Rep. (2d) 318;…

Killian v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Support for that view will be found in some decisions ( N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Feight, 29 Fed. Rep. [2d] 318;…