From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Decarlo v. Pettinato

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jun 19, 1997
303 N.J. Super. 410 (App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 19, 1997.

Before Judges PRESSLER and PETRELLA.


This matter having been duly presented by the court, it is on this 19th day of June, 1997, hereby Ordered as follows:

The motion for leave to appeal is granted and the court elects pursuant to R. 2:8-3(b) summarily to decide the appeal.

We affirm the denial of the summary judgment motion of Cigna Property Casualty Companies for an adjudication of non-coverage based on the business exclusion.

The balance of the summary judgment requiring Cigna Property Casualty Companies to defend and indemnify is reversed as improvident and premature.

/s/ FOR THE COURT:

/s/ SYLVIA B. PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.


Summaries of

Decarlo v. Pettinato

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jun 19, 1997
303 N.J. Super. 410 (App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Decarlo v. Pettinato

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH DECARLO v. JOSEPH PETTINATO

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jun 19, 1997

Citations

303 N.J. Super. 410 (App. Div. 1997)
697 A.2d 145

Citing Cases

Greenberg Covitz v. Nat. Un. Ins. Co.

In that case, the insurer may be obligated to defend the insured from the date when the new claim was…