From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dear v. Weineke

Supreme Court of California
Apr 11, 1892
94 Cal. 322 (Cal. 1892)

Opinion

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County.

         COUNSEL

          J. E. Deakin, and Deakin & Story, for Appellant.

          Johnstone Jones, and J. L. Copeland, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: In Bank.

         OPINION

         THE COURT

          [29 P. 647] This action was brought to recover certain taxes claimed to have been paid under duress, and which it is declared by the appellant were not collectible, by reason of the assessment being invalid.

         The individual whose personal property was assessed gave a list of it in detail, as he states in his complaint, to the assessor, but that official did not list the property in detail, but made this entry in the assessment-book: "Value of personal property, exclusive of money and solvent credits, $ 15,725."

         The complaint is demurred to as not stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff not desiring to amend his complaint, judgment passed for the defendant, from which the present appeal is prosecuted.

         The only question involved is, whether the form of the assessment set out in the assessor's book was sufficient, under section 3650 of the Political Code; and that it was sufficient is, in effect, decided in San Francisco v. Pennie , 93 Cal. 465, and upon the authority of that case the judgment must be affirmed.

         Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Dear v. Weineke

Supreme Court of California
Apr 11, 1892
94 Cal. 322 (Cal. 1892)
Case details for

Dear v. Weineke

Case Details

Full title:PARKER DEAR, Appellant, v. H. W. WEINEKE, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 11, 1892

Citations

94 Cal. 322 (Cal. 1892)
29 P. 646

Citing Cases

Smith v. Addiego

And, further, (p. 471): "For the purpose of determining whether this description was sufficient to identify…

El Tejon Cattle Co. v. San Diego County

Such a general description for assessment purposes is sufficient. ( Dear v. Weineke, 94 Cal. 322 [29 P. 646];…