From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De Palma v. Economy Auto Supply Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 17, 1926
133 A. 919 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Submitted February 12, 1926 —

Decided May 17, 1926.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 827.

For the respondents, Kalisch Kalisch.

For the appellants, Frank G. Turner.


The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

De Palma v. Economy Auto Supply Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 17, 1926
133 A. 919 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

De Palma v. Economy Auto Supply Co.

Case Details

Full title:LUCIA DE PALMA ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. ECONOMY AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY ET AL.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 17, 1926

Citations

133 A. 919 (N.J. 1926)
133 A. 919

Citing Cases

Wadell v. Public Service Coordinated Transport

The defendant was fully aware, as appears from its medical witness' testimony, of the condition involved, and…

Fagan v. Newark

The declaration need not be made to a physician in order to qualify. Id., at p. 562; De Palma v. Economy Auto…