From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

de Cordova v. Sanville

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 16, 1915
108 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1915)

Opinion

Argued February 25, 1915

Decided March 16, 1915

Otto C. Sommerich and Maxwell C. Katz for appellant.

William F. Unger and Samuel P. Goldman for respondent.


Order reversed and interlocutory judgment directed sustaining demurrer, with costs in all courts, on dissenting opinion of INGRAHAM, P.J., below, and with leave to plaintiff to serve amended complaint within twenty days if so advised. Question certified answered in the negative.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, MILLER, CARDOZO and SEABURY, JJ.


Summaries of

de Cordova v. Sanville

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 16, 1915
108 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1915)
Case details for

de Cordova v. Sanville

Case Details

Full title:EVELYN DE CORDOVA, as Executrix of and Trustee under the Will of VERONA DE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 16, 1915

Citations

108 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1915)
108 N.E. 1092

Citing Cases

In re Endicott Johnson Corporation

Aside from the fact that the case was decided almost ninety years ago, it was also reversed in a subsequent…

I. I. Holding Corp. v. Gainsburg

The only allegation in the complaint challenged on this appeal, which, it is said, would admit proof that an…