Opinion
No. 91-1899.
October 5, 1992.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 955 F. 2d 807.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Day v. Moscow
U.S.
Oct 5, 1992
506 U.S. 821 (1992)
Summaries of
Day v. Moscow
U.S.
Oct 5, 1992
506 U.S. 821 (1992)
involving dismissal on res judicata grounds
Summary of this case from In re Kmart Corp.noting that "the alleged distinction between the legal attributes of the unsecured claims is that under state law Phoenix has no recourse against the debtor personally. However, state law is irrelevant where, as here, the Code has eliminated the legal distinction between nonrecourse deficiency claims and other unsecured claims."
Summary of this case from In re JRV Industries, Inc.Case details for
Day v. Moscow
Case Details
Full title:DAY v. MOSCOW ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 5, 1992
Citations
506 U.S. 821 (1992)
Citing Cases
In re Bernhard Steiner Pianos USA, Inc.
03[4][a] (15th ed. rev. 2000). The Fifth Circuit has taught that, as a general premise, substantially similar…
In re Way Apartments, D.T.Eleven U.S.C. § 1122(a) governs the classification of creditors. It states, in pertinent part, "a plan may…