From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Day v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Nov 21, 2002
No. 3:01-CV-1325-P (N.D. Tex. Nov. 21, 2002)

Summary

dismissing § 2254 habeas petition where petitioner failed to notify court of his change of address and orders were returned to the court as undeliverable

Summary of this case from Maldonado-Olivares v. Geo Det. Ctr. Staff

Opinion

No. 3:01-CV-1325-P

November 21, 2002


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.


Summaries of

Day v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Nov 21, 2002
No. 3:01-CV-1325-P (N.D. Tex. Nov. 21, 2002)

dismissing § 2254 habeas petition where petitioner failed to notify court of his change of address and orders were returned to the court as undeliverable

Summary of this case from Maldonado-Olivares v. Geo Det. Ctr. Staff

dismissing § 2254 habeas petition where petitioner failed to notify court of his change of address and orders were returned to the court as undeliverable

Summary of this case from Mendoza-Soto v. Davis

dismissing § 2254 habeas petition where petitioner failed to notify court of his change of address and orders were returned to the court as undeliverable

Summary of this case from Walker v. Sifuentes

dismissing § 2254 habeas petition where petitioner failed to notify court of his change of address and orders were returned to the court as undeliverable

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Cordova-Sanchez
Case details for

Day v. Cockrell

Case Details

Full title:Johnathon William Day, ID # 901997, Plaintiff, v. Janie Cockrell…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Nov 21, 2002

Citations

No. 3:01-CV-1325-P (N.D. Tex. Nov. 21, 2002)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Sifuentes

Because Plaintiff failed to provide an updated address in compliance with Local Rule 83.4 and did not respond…

U.S. v. Cordova-Sanchez

His failure to prosecute constitutes a sufficient ground for dismissal of this case. See Carey v. King, 856…